Knitting pattern rule #1
I have read a lot of knitting patterns in my life. I have made a lot of things from knitting patterns in my life.
I am starting to develop some real biases against poorly written knitting patterns. Now, I know enough to be able to figure out most knitting patterns, although if I'm following a pattern it's because I'm feeling too lazy to write it myself and I clearly don't want to do a lot of figuring.
But new knitters often don't have enough experience to think for themselves and second-guess a pattern.
I teach knitting at the Library where I work and help people with a wide variety of skill levels.
I helped a knitter this week who was flummoxed as to why the fronts and back of the child's cardigan she was knitting were 1" off in length. I carefully "read' her knitting and she had followed the pattern instructions exactly, but still there was this difference - what was the problem? She guessed that maybe her gauge had changed drastically from the fronts to the back but she's a pretty even and consistent knitter, so that wasn't it.
Gauge, it turns out, was the answer. The pattern instructions for the back said to knit for 5" after casting on before beginning armhole shaping. The instructions for the back were written out line by line, since there was shaping at the bottom edge.
The problem was that her row gauge didn't match the row gauge of the pattern. The back was 5" to armhole and the front was 48 rows. If her row gauge had been on those two would have been the same but in reality the fronts were 1" longer because of the gauge difference.
I understand that the onus is on the knitter to know what's going on with gauge (To Save Time Check Gauge - we've all read it!) but how hard would it have been for the designer to specify the number of rows to knit the back so it would always match the front in length? Hmmm?
So my first rule of knitting patterns is this: Specify length for all pieces in the same units of measure.
So there.
I am starting to develop some real biases against poorly written knitting patterns. Now, I know enough to be able to figure out most knitting patterns, although if I'm following a pattern it's because I'm feeling too lazy to write it myself and I clearly don't want to do a lot of figuring.
But new knitters often don't have enough experience to think for themselves and second-guess a pattern.
I teach knitting at the Library where I work and help people with a wide variety of skill levels.
I helped a knitter this week who was flummoxed as to why the fronts and back of the child's cardigan she was knitting were 1" off in length. I carefully "read' her knitting and she had followed the pattern instructions exactly, but still there was this difference - what was the problem? She guessed that maybe her gauge had changed drastically from the fronts to the back but she's a pretty even and consistent knitter, so that wasn't it.
Gauge, it turns out, was the answer. The pattern instructions for the back said to knit for 5" after casting on before beginning armhole shaping. The instructions for the back were written out line by line, since there was shaping at the bottom edge.
The problem was that her row gauge didn't match the row gauge of the pattern. The back was 5" to armhole and the front was 48 rows. If her row gauge had been on those two would have been the same but in reality the fronts were 1" longer because of the gauge difference.
I understand that the onus is on the knitter to know what's going on with gauge (To Save Time Check Gauge - we've all read it!) but how hard would it have been for the designer to specify the number of rows to knit the back so it would always match the front in length? Hmmm?
So my first rule of knitting patterns is this: Specify length for all pieces in the same units of measure.
So there.




